Nova

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
bread-making-vikings
bread-making-vikings

This site has been going around Twitter trans accounts quite a bit lately, so just pointing out here too that it'll do fuck all, they're exploiting trans people at a time when hrt is particularly hard to access and please don't give them your money

image



EDIT:

yes I know it was a scam to get information off people, I know it was run by a neo-nazi, I know it's been shut down. There is a lot of information in the reblogs which I recommend you check out rather than sharing this base post from weeks ago before any of this was known, or sending me pissy asks and reblogs with this.

DIY hrt is not inherently dangerous, any transmeds/TERFs/anti-DIY replies will get blocked. The reblogs also have information on safer DIY hrt for people without other options. My personal recommendation is diyhrt . wiki.

ivanpahdrylakeracer
ivanpahdrylakeracer

image
image
image

keep seeing Temu ads on here so just to share cause idk if people are widely aware


EDIT TO ADD: here’s a snopes article some lovely people have been reblogging with. imo it essentially confirms the claims made above but always do your own research and decide for yourself - i’m just a person in the internet. ALSO just to clarify i absolutely do not support or participate in sinophobia - the app could be from the moon for all i care i shared to make people aware of its aggressive data mining (something which apps from all countries can and have been guilty of)

bbygirl-obi
bbygirl-obi

☐ single

☐ taken

☑ thinking about the scene in dooku: jedi lost where yoda and dooku are discussing a jedi named yula braylon who secretly had a son and hid him out of fear that the jedi would hate her for it, aka the exact fear anakin had with padme in rots, and yoda confirmed that if she had told the council, the council would have helped her, just like they would have helped anakin:

image
professorcoldheart
professorcoldheart

"Once an employer grants that their workforce can dictate, or even shift, the terms of production, they have conceded sacred ground. The myth of employers as "job creators" depends on a job being something an employer may grant or withhold out of noblesse oblige, not something that exists in partnership with the worker doing it. The ability of a board to make promises to investors depends on the board being the only voice that matters. This is why employers fight corps-a-corps, flag-nailed-to-the-mast, against union concessions.

And this is why all reporting on AI must be viewed not as a question of "language" or "intelligence" or "creativity", but as a question of control. Who dictates where LLMs will be used: the rank-and-file employee or the manager supervising them? Whose labor is being replaced by a neural network: an executive or a frontline worker? Where do the benefits of increased productivity or reduced costs go: into paychecks or into buybacks?"